Not this year: one of last year's juveniles in first week of flying above the woods, 29.vii.2016 |
Adult vocalisations around food delivery decline to silence
The last post (4 June) mentioned the many many hours of observation I had put in for little return. Few spells of calling as anticipated around food delivery, and even fewer sightings of the provisioning male leaving the nest valley. On several days I'd be in the area for five or six hours with no evidence for nest provisioning at all. Not unheard of normally, but not day after day, and not at a time when advanced chicks might be expected in a successful nest. I originally put this down to the pair simply being naturally quiet, perhaps with a different male showing different flight habits.
In fact the events (of 3 June) outlined in that last post turn out to have been the last calling sequence that seemed largely as expected: since then I have rarely glimpsed the male, there have been no 'normal' exchanges of k-k-k and wee-oo calling by male and female of the pair, and in the last few days (writing this paragraph on 15th June) almost all vocalisations have ceased, apart from some occasional quiet k-k-k calls, mainly from a part of the woods 100 metres or so uphill from the nest tree. This is normally a patch from where the male first calls when bringing food, but between 10-15 June when I've heard some k-k-k calls from there, there has been little or nothing in response from around the nest tree.
It was all going so well. The male back on 21 April 2017 |
Significance of the female "wee-oo" call
I use "k-k-k" and "wee-oo", or similar, as a kind of shorthand. Penteriani (2001), and Schnell (1958) more thoroughly describe the range of calls, their occurrence over the year, and presumed function. The female "wee-oo" call is particularly significant as an indicator of events at the nest. Schnell (1958), followed by Penteriani (2001) recognise variants of this call type: 'recognition scream' (when she sees the male return to the vicinity), 'transfer scream' (around transfer of prey, possibly to encourage transfer), and 'dismissal scream' (encouraging the male to leave the nest, presumably to continue hunting).
Sometimes I can fit what I hear with this classification but I have no visual contact with the birds so can only infer a very coarse picture of what may be happening. Typically a more or less agitated exchange of calls, with the birds apparently coming into proximity from initial more separated positions, the female uttering a few wee-oo calls, sometimes loud and excited, after which the male can sometimes be seen as he leaves the nest site.
The decline in frequency of this female call type during June, and its apparent absence since the 11th, the last definite record in my notebook, made me seriously concerned about the status of this season's breeding attempt. Did absence of female calls associated with prey delivery by the male mean absence of the female, or absence of prey deliveries, or both?
Male leaving after food delivery, arrow marks full crop, 7.vii.2017 |
Nest apparently deserted
So on 15 June I decided to take a gamble on perhaps disturbing them by going further uphill on the track through the woods to where it curves around the top of the large concave slope in which the nest tree is located; there is a spot on that track (reconnoitred in winter) where, with a lucky breeze to move intervening foliage, it is sometimes possible to get a partial view of the nest (100 or 120 metres away downslope but not much above eye level) and check if there is an adult or chick near fledgling size visible or not. There was not, nor were there alarm calls from any hawk that might have been on watch nearby, even though I stayed for some time (and would no doubt have been seen by any adult hawk in the vicinity) trying to sort out whether different patches of light were just light reflecting from leaves or perhaps a downy chick. I could not exclude the possibility that a young bird might have been laying flat in the nest bowl, but thought it unlikely. Despite everything apparently going well in May the nest now appeared deserted. I returned over the next couple of days, just in case an adult had temporarily left the nest area when I viewed it on the 15th, but I neither heard nor saw any sign of occupation and concluded reluctantly that this year's breeding had failed.
It is not clear to me why the breeding attempt should have failed at this point. The last time I'm aware of it happening was in mid-June 2013 after a sequence of days with torrential rain followed by a massive and damaging hailstorm. Is there some kind of milestone around the middle of June, perhaps to do with chicks attaining some critical size and vigour, that has to be passed for the brood to progress and fledge successfully?
I'm not aware of any disturbance around the nest site beyond the very occasional trail bike rider in the vicinity. There has been no timber extraction in the vicinity over the breeding season. Typically there will be a few people in the area looking for truffles and other fungi after periods of rain, but there has been virtually no rain. Perhaps the most likely explanation is that either the male has not been able to keep up an adequate food supply to the nest (perhaps also connected with the extreme dryness), or one of the pair has met with an accident while away from the nest, or been overtaken by disease or old age. Perhaps the female was an inexperienced 2cy bird*.
Penteriani, V. 2001. The annual and diel cycles of Goshawk vocalizations at nest sites. J. Raptor Res. 35(1):24-30.
Schnell, J.H. 1958. Nesting behavior and food habits of goshawks in the Sierra Nevada of California. Condor 60:377-403. Available online (accessed 16.vi.2017): https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/condor/v060n06/p0377-p0403.pdf
*The feathers later recovered at the foot of the nest tree, see Postscript, suggest the female was an adult, at least 3cy. This is based on the faded bars on the secondary (thanks to P.Sunesen), see BirdForum post HERE.
_____________________________________________________
Postscript added 21 June 2017.
The nest (circled): an adjacent Aspen has leaned over and both have several dead upper branches, the nest is much more exposed than before. |
Secondary and tail feathers found under nest Upper surface, left. 18.vi.2017 |
No comments:
Post a Comment